Recent Blog Posts

01 Nov 2026 12:00 AM • Susan Viguers


Book Art Theory

Capitalizing on the interdisciplinary nature of the field, this blog calls attention to criticism and theory about the book as a medium and/or subject in works of art and, more generally, about book art. It seeks to encourage dialogue, solicit comments, and create a generative space for new ideas from critics and theorists of various fields regarding the aesthetic, semiotic, haptic, cognitive, historical, and other features that distinguish these works and their function in ethical, political, and social matters.

To contribute to the list of underrepresented voices in the book arts, see CBAA Book Art + Social Justice Resource List.

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   Next >  Last >> 
  • 01 Nov 2026 12:00 AM | Susan Viguers (Administrator)

    I have been thinking lately (and always) about the ways in which form impacts the experience of (and function of) an artwork. In particular, I have been contemplating how much information various forms can hold or communicate. Here, I would like to argue that artist books are especially equipped to help us understand more complex aspects of the human condition (or other themes and topics) than other artforms, because artist books can easily become part of the extended mind. 

    The extended mind is a term coined by Andy Clark and David Chalmers which explains that our minds do not stop at the barrier of our skulls, but instead our minds use the world around us to assist with thinking. This action is also known as “cognitive offloading.” There are three categories of offloading that our minds naturally do: we offload memory (like writing a reminder on paper), we offload computation (this is harder to explain but includes things like physically organizing/categorizing or turning things to make connections easier to spot), and we offload attention (like when you set an alarm so you don’t have to mentally track how much time has passed).

    Regarding our memories, our brains can only hold around four different things in our working memory at a time. By using a pen and paper to help solve a math problem, the person solving a complex problem doesn’t have to remember all of the variables at once because they have offloaded the information to the paper, allowing them to focus on one step of the problem at a time. Making art is a way of cognitively offloading parts of an idea we are working through. The artwork holds a considerable amount of information so we do not have to remember it all at once, freeing us up to think about more complex ideas a little at a time, building a mental scaffolding.

     

    Beth Sheehan, Reconstruction, 2023-24, litho and screenprint.

    The artwork also becomes a place to cognitively offload computation. By working through the ideas in a physical form, we can more easily see the connections and outcomes of our thinking. For example, in my artwork titled “Reconstruction” (shown above), I am working through the idea that our memories are not fixed snapshots of the past because each time we recall a moment, we are actually reconstructing it and altering it. By making the print, I no longer have to imagine what that reconstruction might be like. Instead, there is something external for me to respond to. I have offloaded the memory reconstruction portion of my idea so that I can move on to the next implication. My artwork has become an embodied “if this…” so that I can now focus on answering the “then what” part of my conceptual explorations.

    Going back to my earlier example, in the same way that using a pen and paper can allow someone to solve more complex equations, I think that making artist books allows us to understand more complex concepts (and communicate those concepts more effectively to our audience) because each aspect of the artist book is like having an additional sheet of paper to work out our math problem. But at a certain point, our brains will overload if we are attempting to tackle too complex of an idea, even with assistance from cognitive offloading, because of our brain’s limited working memory.

    The way our minds alleviate this problem is by turning several pieces of associated information into singular chunks (yes, that is the official term the researchers use). For example, it is harder to remember the eight individual items in the sequence B-O-O-K-A-R-T-S, but our brains will form them into a chunk (the words “book arts”) which is now a singular bit of information.

                

    Beth Sheehan, Between Tenses, 2017. Staple binding. Risograph printed.

    Artist books do this chunking as part of their form and they do it more effectively than a singular print, painting, or sculpture can. When we look at a book, we will naturally pause at a spread in a codex to try to comprehend that individual spread before turning the page to contemplate the next chunk of visual information. But even with less straight-forward forms of artist books, the artist book medium lends itself to chunking huge amounts of information, making it more digestible.

     

    Beth Sheehan, Memento, 2015-2022 Nine panels and a time-capsule in a clamshell box.

    Using the example of my artist book titled “Memento,” (shown above), you can see that this work can hold more information than my “Reconstruction” print can, because it has more parts. But the additional information does not automatically lead to cognitive overload because the individual bits of information (each image, word, material, the size, the colors, the movement, etc.) get chunked in their relationship to each other and their separation from each other.

    Our brains do this so well, you have probably already started to chunk parts of “Memento” together: perhaps the photographs in the box become one chunk, the time-capsule panel in the bottom of the box becomes another, and the clamshell box as a whole becomes a third. But those chunks are made of smaller chunks and the different configurations of chunking reveals a narrative within the work.

    For example, the visual information such as the size of the photographs, their layout, their colors, and even the placement of the letterpress printed text in the margin gets chunked together and recategorized as referencing Polaroids. Because that chunk of information has been labeled, more information is revealed through association: Polaroids typically fade over time so the clamshell box may start to be interpreted as protective, but I have reproduced the Polaroids that go inside the box as archival inkjet prints while the Polaroid on the outside of the box is real and unprotected, fading each time I display the project. 

    To reiterate my point, because of the nature of artist books as complex vessels for information, they are uniquely equipped to help us understand huge concepts by organizing that information and holding it for us as an extension of our brains while we experience the artwork.

     

    Beth Sheehan is an artist currently living in Chicago, IL. She teaches paper, print, and book workshops around the US and virtually. She co-authored the book Bookforms. Sheehan has also worked as a professional printer at Durham Press and Harland and Weaver and was the Bindery Manager at Small Editions.


  • 15 Oct 2026 12:00 AM | Susan Viguers (Administrator)

    This is a continuation of the post, “Between Definitions: The infrathin possibilities of the book,” in which I described the process of assembling 123 definitions of “the book” by artists, librarians, scholars, and booksellers. The more I engage with the book as both object and idea, the more I see its definition in the infrathin spaces where one definition rubs up against the next. Below you will find a series of gatherings that shelve connected definitions alongside one another.

    A book is a technology of insurrection, an ungovernable animal.

    —Gabriela Jauregui

    *

    *

    The book is the sword in stone nestled in the belly of the empire. Many have sought to wield its power, devouring and destroying it in their quest. But the book resists by remaining dormant—its full powers yet to be revealed by a yearning public.

    —Vivian Sming

    *

    *

    A book eludes definition; it is a free being, always open, even in the most hermetic and illegible of cases, even when censored, awaiting to be read, to be listened to. The book is a generous being—a whole universe—that offers itself to you. It shelters you, moves you, sometimes acts as a poetic provocation; at times, it wounds you terribly, always through an intimate, embodied encounter—a place of refuge, a space to honor imagination, to inhabit, to linger in, or perhaps to let go.

    —Shirin Salehi

    *

    *

    The book: refuge, dissent, beacon, and nexus.

    —Lisa Pearson

    *

    *

    A book is dynamic. It functions as a catalyst: its purpose is to change its reader. A book embodies, suggests, conjures, informs, instructs; it frames alternatives; it provides other ways of knowing, being, and doing.

    —Emily Larned

    *

    *

    The book is a living entity. It is an entanglement, an interweaving of different (human and nonhuman) agencies.

    The book is a specific material apparatus, of which we are a part. Books as apparatuses are performative; they are active agentic forms that are reality shaping.

    Books are always in the process of becoming (albeit a process that is continuously interrupted and disturbed), they cut together and apart. Through these book binding and unbinding practices, both the book as we know it and we ourselves arise.

    —Janneke Adema

    *

    *

    A book is an object that invites an experience.

    Something must turn for the book to be experienced: pages, leaves, a word, a worm, your head, the room.

    —Genevieve Kaplan

    *

    *

    As a network of embodied interactions, the book invites us all to delve into the spatial, temporal, visual, verbal, and tactile experiences it brings together.

    —Tatiani Rapatzikou

    *

    *

    The book is our desire to hold together what time pulls apart. It is our collective will to accumulate the fragments of what we know, reassemble them in sensible form, and so come to understand.

    —Whitney Trettien

    *

    *

    The book is a time travel device—allowing us to slip into the imagination of a future mind.

    —Indira Allegra

    *

    *

    A book is a time machine. The time it takes to conceive and create a book is compressed into a physical form, then expands when the book is read. This compression of time is rarely linear. Nor is its expansion, though it has limits: a book begins and ends. Because it takes time to read a book, its meaning changes as it is read. Because time carries on, a book’s meaning also changes when it is not being read. Copies of a book may survive for some time after its last reading. Or a book may persist conceptually after its last copy is gone. The time it takes to read a book may be a portion of the time it takes to create another book. The same is true of a book’s survival. In this sense, a book neither begins nor ends.

    —Levi Sherman

    *

    *

    The book is a dislocation device.

    —Travis Shaffer

     

    Amaranth Borsuk is a poet, scholar, and book artist working at the intersection of print and digital media. She is the author of 7 individual and collaborative books, most recently W/\SH with Terri Witek. She is Associate Professor of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at the University of Washington Bothell.

     


  • 01 Oct 2026 9:59 AM | Susan Viguers (Administrator)

    What exactly is a book? In The Book (MIT Press, 2018) I tried to define it with respect to its status as object, content, idea, and interface. Detailing the book’s history of changing material forms and looking to the limit cases of artists’ books and digital books, The Book acknowledges that its object of inquiry is changeable, contested, and shaped largely through dialogue and experimentation. Rather than staking a claim on a specific definition, I designed the book to include as many voices as possible—where the series had set aside space for pull-quotes from the text, I inserted quotations from the thinkers and makers who inspired my research—a chorus of definitions and re-framings. Yet even as I assembled the manuscript, I knew there were many more people I wanted to talk to—many more possible definitions than could be enclosed within those covers.

    In April 2018, I set out to gather some of those definitions, contacting writers, artists, bookbinders, publishers, librarians, and scholars to ask What is the/a book? I viewed the 101 responses I received as a critical companion to The Book, one that would fill gaps both known and unforeseen. I published those definitions at t-h-e-b-o-o-k.com that summer and fall. As they fell into place, the individual voices became a kind of collective, gathered under the banner of the book. Together, we published those definitions in The American Book Review in 2020, and in 2021 The Centre for Expanded Poetics in Montreal brought out a Riso-printed artists’ edition, The Book: 101 Definitions, with their partners at Anteism Press. It felt fitting that these words kept finding their way into the world (and into the hands of readers) in different forms.

    This fall, Invisible Books will re-issue the once-again shapeshifting collection as The Book: 123 Definitions. Five years after its first printing, and eight years after these definitions were first formulated feels like an ideal time to widen the circle of possibility and invite new perspectives, particularly as my own understanding of “the book” remains in flux. In 2018, I described the book as a portable information storage and retrieval technology—a material form for the dissemination of text. But that definition fails to encompass all that the word “book” has come to mean to me—a meaning that inheres in the spaces between these definitions and between the people they represent.

    In August of 2024 I lost my library, which disintegrated into water and ash when lightning struck the roof of our Seattle home. As I continue to process that loss, I have come to realize how much each book is, to me, a point of contact with another person, a relationship, and a memory. My definition of the book is something like what Marcel Duchamp called the infrathin / inframince. Tangible and intangible at once, he explained the infrathin only through examples, of which my favorite is “La chaleur d’un siège (qui vient d’être quitté)” (the heat of a seat that has just been left). Perhaps the book’s meaning is in the traces of all the hands that touched it, their imperceptible warmth; and perhaps it is also in the minute embrace where the cover of one paperback has laminated to its neighbor as its invisible coating melted, then scorched.    

    As I gathered new definitions to interweave with those in the original collection, I kept finding the heat where one definition seemed to rub up against another, without the authors knowing whose words just occupied that same imagined page, that saddle, that seat. And I felt a strong sense of hope surrounded by the perspectives of people to whom books continue to matter, ephemeral as they are. In an ideal world, the 101 and 123 definitions will continue to multiply into future gatherings that expand what’s possible for those of us who continue to make, read, savor, and share books. 

    Amaranth Borsuk is a poet, scholar, and book artist working at the intersection of print and digital media. She is the author of 7 individual and collaborative books, most recently W/\SH with Terri Witek. She is Associate Professor of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at the University of Washington Bothell.

  • 01 Oct 2026 12:00 AM | Susan Viguers (Administrator)

    I have been thinking lately (and always) about the ways in which form impacts the experience of (and function of) an artwork. In particular, I have been contemplating how much information various forms can hold or communicate. Here, I would like to argue that artist books are especially equipped to help us understand more complex aspects of the human condition (or other themes and topics) than other artforms, because artist books can easily become part of the extended mind. 

    The extended mind is a term coined by Andy Clark and David Chalmers which explains that our minds do not stop at the barrier of our skulls, but instead our minds use the world around us to assist with thinking. This action is also known as “cognitive offloading.” There are three categories of offloading that our minds naturally do: we offload memory (like writing a reminder on paper), we offload computation (this is harder to explain but includes things like physically organizing/categorizing or turning things to make connections easier to spot), and we offload attention (like when you set an alarm so you don’t have to mentally track how much time has passed).

    Regarding our memories, our brains can only hold around four different things in our working memory at a time. By using a pen and paper to help solve a math problem, the person solving a complex problem doesn’t have to remember all of the variables at once because they have offloaded the information to the paper, allowing them to focus on one step of the problem at a time. Making art is a way of cognitively offloading parts of an idea we are working through. The artwork holds a considerable amount of information so we do not have to remember it all at once, freeing us up to think about more complex ideas a little at a time, building a mental scaffolding.


    Beth Sheehan, Reconstruction, 2023-24, litho and screenprint.

    The artwork also becomes a place to cognitively offload computation. By working through the ideas in a physical form, we can more easily see the connections and outcomes of our thinking. For example, in my artwork titled “Reconstruction” (shown above), I am working through the idea that our memories are not fixed snapshots of the past because each time we recall a moment, we are actually reconstructing it and altering it. By making the print, I no longer have to imagine what that reconstruction might be like. Instead, there is something external for me to respond to. I have offloaded the memory reconstruction portion of my idea so that I can move on to the next implication. My artwork has become an embodied “if this…” so that I can now focus on answering the “then what” part of my conceptual explorations.

    Going back to my earlier example, in the same way that using a pen and paper can allow someone to solve more complex equations, I think that making artist books allows us to understand more complex concepts (and communicate those concepts more effectively to our audience) because each aspect of the artist book is like having an additional sheet of paper to work out our math problem. But at a certain point, our brains will overload if we are attempting to tackle too complex of an idea, even with assistance from cognitive offloading, because of our brain’s limited working memory.

    The way our minds alleviate this problem is by turning several pieces of associated information into singular chunks (yes, that is the official term the researchers use). For example, it is harder to remember the eight individual items in the sequence B-O-O-K-A-R-T-S, but our brains will form them into a chunk (the words “book arts”) which is now a singular bit of information.

                

    Beth Sheehan, Between Tenses, 2017. Staple binding. Risograph printed.

    Artist books do this chunking as part of their form and they do it more effectively than a singular print, painting, or sculpture can. When we look at a book, we will naturally pause at a spread in a codex to try to comprehend that individual spread before turning the page to contemplate the next chunk of visual information. But even with less straight-forward forms of artist books, the artist book medium lends itself to chunking huge amounts of information, making it more digestible.

     

    Beth Sheehan, Memento, 2015-2022 Nine panels and a time-capsule in a clamshell box.

    Using the example of my artist book titled “Memento,” (shown above), you can see that this work can hold more information than my “Reconstruction” print can, because it has more parts. But the additional information does not automatically lead to cognitive overload because the individual bits of information (each image, word, material, the size, the colors, the movement, etc.) get chunked in their relationship to each other and their separation from each other.

    Our brains do this so well, you have probably already started to chunk parts of “Memento” together: perhaps the photographs in the box become one chunk, the time-capsule panel in the bottom of the box becomes another, and the clamshell box as a whole becomes a third. But those chunks are made of smaller chunks and the different configurations of chunking reveals a narrative within the work.

    For example, the visual information such as the size of the photographs, their layout, their colors, and even the placement of the letterpress printed text in the margin gets chunked together and recategorized as referencing Polaroids. Because that chunk of information has been labeled, more information is revealed through association: Polaroids typically fade over time so the clamshell box may start to be interpreted as protective, but I have reproduced the Polaroids that go inside the box as archival inkjet prints while the Polaroid on the outside of the box is real and unprotected, fading each time I display the project. 

    To reiterate my point, because of the nature of artist books as complex vessels for information, they are uniquely equipped to help us understand huge concepts by organizing that information and holding it for us as an extension of our brains while we experience the artwork.

     

    Beth Sheehan is an artist currently living in Chicago, IL. She teaches paper, print, and book workshops around the US and virtually. She co-authored the book Bookforms. Sheehan has also worked as a professional printer at Durham Press and Harland and Weaver and was the Bindery Manager at Small Editions.


  • 15 Sep 2026 12:00 AM | Susan Viguers (Administrator)

    This is a continuation of the September 1st post.

    As is common among book artists, I introduce viewers to my books on my website. The structure and images of most of my books are so entwined with the text that the book does not make sense if that text isn’t read. For Lily Yeh’s and my Rwanda book, I experimented with a video that included pauses allowing the viewer to read the text. The result was embarrassingly dull (and never posted). It jolted me into recognizing that the usual reason for introducing one’s book on a website is to present a glimpse, an arresting visual glimpse of the book. That does not include experiencing the book. I was reminded of that when I checked out the images and the handling video, on the Big Jump Press website, of Katie Baldwin’s and Sarah Bryant’s remarkable new artist book, Small Patches of Land. Although certainly presenting a visually beautiful book, the website does not in the least communicate the multifaceted experience of the book, one that requires that it be handled and read. (I knew that because I had the book.) So how can a book artist give actual access to experiencing one’s books?

    There is nothing new about that discussion. See, for one of many examples, Anna Platz-Twelt’s essay on her Art Blog, “Artist Books: Display and Exhibition,” and online there are at present a number of archives that go beyond letting you know about the book to actually moving through it – digitally, of course. Johanna Drucker’s ArtistBooksOnLine project may now be defunct, but it was highly effective and influential in, among other things, promoting the value and need for that. The Cynthia Sears Artists’ Book Collection of Bainbridge Island Museum of Art, in its critically focused Artists’ Books’ Unshelved series, presents books in a holistic way, one that includes attention to the experience of moving through a book – its images, tactility, and text. Aaron Cohick and AB Gorham’s S Apostrophe S Artist Book Readings, an online series of book artists showing and reading their books, gets even closer to capturing the experience of an artist book. The virtual world also, of course, offers digital versions of some printed books, which allows the viewer to move through a book on their own. But nothing online of which I am aware deals with both the issue of the reader’s agency and the physiological experience of handling and reading a book.

    When I submitted a book to the Madison CBAA conference exhibition, I included a note stipulating that the book be handled. But when I got to the exhibition, I found every book was labeled the same, “Please do not touch.” There were many books at the exhibition displayed with a spread that, although not giving the full experience of the book, was arresting, evocative, often visually tactile. Overall, I felt that that created a rather successful exhibition of art – visual art. However, my book did not contribute to that success because of the extent that the visual was mediated by other modalities, the temporal and the verbal. And my book was not alone.

    That exhibition made me quick to agree to help with planning and designing an exhibition that would include artist books for the eighty-plus year-old organization American Color Print Society that in the past had just exhibited prints. The first suggestion that came up for exhibiting books was for a table, on which books would be placed, with chairs. I felt strongly, however, that the books needed to have the same presence as the art on the wall, which meant that they’d be on the same visual level – on pedestals or shelves – and not require a rather major interruption in the audience’s usual movement through the gallery by asking them to pull out a chair and sit down. Prospective book artists would be asked if they wanted a book handled and how it should be displayed. My thought was that the books to be handled would be in one area, with prominent signage above stating something to the effect of “These books require being handled and read.”

    But it turned out, only two books, one being mine and one a zine, were clearly in that category. There were, however, quite a few artists who stated that their books could be handled “gently.” So, in the end, there was no big sign insisting on handling, but small tags next to each book, one “Please do not touch,” another “Please handle gently,” and, for two, “This book needs to be handled and read.” On opening night, I saw a few people touch books that had that “gently” tag, but they didn’t pick up and read the book. Due to the many available pedestals and the support of the installing team and the books that, despite their static pose, were visually remarkable, the artist books, I felt, did contribute to the success of the exhibition. But, again, it was an art exhibition and did not fully give expression to what artist books are.

    Since that show, I’ve been mulling over the word “gently.” My original thought was that for those book artists their work had a preciousness that had more weight than the artists’ need to have their books experienced. But that is an oversimplification. Handling a book goes against accepted behavior at art exhibitions for both audience and artist. Also, of course, there’s the problem implicit in that handling. A museum has guards who make sure you don’t cross the line separating you from, protecting, the painting. There’s clarity to that. But when does handling a book cross the “gently” line?

    Book fairs offer the opportunity for the viewer to be in the same physical space as the book and often the opportunity to handle the artist book. I approach them, however, with ambivalence. First, there are so many tables, so many books! There’s no way I can give them the attention I’d like. Also, occasionally and understandably, when a collector who may buy a book, is also there, I’m clearly in the way. But much more frequently, indeed routinely, my experience of handling a book is undercut by my awareness of the artist behind the table, watching, hoping I won’t suddenly just put the book down.

    The Members Showcase at the CBAA 2024 conference was smaller, more intimate, than the usual book fair – and not focused on sales – but I still felt that discomfort with examining a work with the artist there watching. At Clif Meador’s table, I admired his new book, Endloser Krieg / Endless War, as he turned the pages, but I couldn’t help complaining that what I wanted to do is to sit down and read the book, taking my own time. So, he invited me to come sit, back behind the table, and read it. It was only then that I understood the arresting visual art of the book as part of complex powerful experience that, though ostensibly about the 17thcentury Thirty Years War, was in fact much more than that.

    So, I am back to the issue of access to artist books and my feeling that focusing on artist books as simply a visual art form denies something essential about at least many artist books. Artist books are not just a theater of one, but a physical theater of one. A double curse.


    Susan Viguers began her career as a scholar and teacher of literature and writing at the University of the Arts. Mid-career she transitioned from Liberal Arts into the College of Art and Design, began making artist books, and eventually, for nine years, directed the MFA Book Arts/Printmaking Program.

  • 01 Sep 2026 12:00 AM | Susan Viguers (Administrator)

    There’s no argument at the center of this blog post, at least that I’m aware of right now. I don’t have trouble thinking of “arguments” – that’s from my academic background – but these days, whenever I do, I immediately think of how partial it is, how limited, how beside the point. So here, rather than arguing, I’m simply ruminating.

    When Lily Yey's and my book on the Rwanda genocide, which we’d self-printed, was picked up by New Village Press, the title was changed and the phrase “an Artist Book” was added. I mentioned that to Clif Meador when walking down Broad St. – he was in Philadelphia working on a book at the Borowsky Center – and he groaned. I remember thinking and maybe saying something to defend the publisher’s addition. It prepared the reader to understand that the content would be communicated as much by the images and design as by the text, a different approach than that to the scholarly books they usually published. Why is Ben Lerner’s recent book titled “Transcription, A Novel”? That “A Novel” oriented me to approach what I would be reading as having the depth in time and space and complexity of a novel (a long novel), in spite of it being only 129 pages, and it being fiction, in spite of, or along with, the neutral accuracy associated with the word “transcription.” Terms such as “artist book” and “novel” can be useful.

    That leads me into a maze of interconnecting, overlapping trains of thought. One is to the issue of audience. How important is the audience in the creation of a book or a work of art. I’m not referring to the arguments of literary critics such as Stanley Fish that the reader is the essential creator or to Roland Barthes’ “death of the author.” Rather I am thinking of the audience from the artist’s perspective. For whom are we making our book? I would argue that consciously or unconsciously we are thinking of a particular audience. And isn’t that significant in defining what we do?

    That takes me back to the phrase “artist book.” I’m most comfortable with Levi Sherman’s term “book thinking.” (See his blog post with that title.) For me that captures what I feel is essential about “artist books” without the danger of being too limited or too expansive that can accompany that phrase. “Book thinking,” however, approaches the field from an angle that doesn’t provide me with the language to talk about the specific works I want to talk about. I interpret Richard Minsky’s discussion in his post “Why Bother with Wikipedia?” as supporting the usefulness of the usual terminology. So, at least for the moment, I am back to the phrase “artist book.”

    Which leads me into another line of thought, which I’ll take up in the next blog post. What do the exhibitions of artist books reveal about our thinking of them?

    To start with the first issue, that of audience, there was objection, early in this blog, to including a post on the Eric Carle Museum since he is a creator of picture books, not artist books. In Carle’s books, text, image, design, structure are fused – form is content – something I consider the lodestar for artist books. His books are, of course, commercially packaged/published, which for many is a strike against them as “artist books”; it wouldn’t make sense to buy hugely expensive books for children. But I also sense that the fact that the audience is children contributed to the objection. Artist books are for adults! Initiated adults at that. The creators of artist books in the early tradition of “fine press” books were/are consciously, it seems to me, thinking of a particular elite adult audience – like minded artists, and, for selling, collectors and Special Collections, which of course usually allow access, but limited to a specialized and primed population. The audience they create for, it seems to me, is not so much interested in what is being expressed, but in how elegantly, impressively, it is rendered, a rendering that, of course, honors a particular text or subject.

    Moving to another category of book artists, the maker of zines has different goals and creates for quite a different audience, one with different aesthetic values and who has no interest in paying much money, but still not for children. Their reason for making the zine is to communicate something in a way that will have impact on their audience. One reason for the limited scope of the audience for individual works is simply that are just so many zines out there!

    Then there’s another rather undefined grouping of artist books – tactile, visual, often textual (overlapping the subcategory of fine press books), and in various ways, sculptural. Not only are these books very expensive, as are those called “fine press,” but many need to be handled in order to be fully experienced, for the viewer to grasp what’s essential to, the reason for, the work. The creators of those books must be aware, or, if not, they are repressing the thought, that they are creating for a very circumscribed audience. If you say you are a book artist, or that you make artist books, people generally have absolutely no idea what you mean, unless, of course, you’re talking to one of your kind.

    But what’s wrong with creating work for a very limited audience? Publishers require prospective writers to know and define their audience. CBAA and, of course, the Center for Book Arts in New York as well as other book art centers are committed to furthering the knowledge and impact of artist books and increasing the inclusivity of the field. But for some kinds of artist books, the very qualities that can make them such impactful works of art create a barrier keeping potential audience out. But, of course, that doesn’t necessarily have to matter. It didn’t matter that those extraordinarily illuminated Books of Hours in the Middle Ages were created for just one person. However, as a creator of artist books, that bothers me. I create books to communicate something I am thinking, feeling, seeing, that can’t be expressed in any other way.  If I can’t reach my audience, creating an artist book feels rather meaningless.

    To be continued.


    Susan Viguers began her career as a scholar and teacher of literature and writing at the University of the Arts. Mid-career she transitioned from Liberal Arts into the College of Art and Design, began making artist books, and eventually, for nine years, directed the MFA Book Arts/Printmaking Program.

  • 15 Aug 2026 12:00 AM | Susan Viguers (Administrator)

    As a life-long academic, obviously I love information, but when it comes to books it's really the container that interests me. I started out as a medieval historian and I specialized in late antiquity: the transition from Roman imperial culture to the new medieval culture. Since the codex was invented in that period, I can’t help but think about the book-as-technology, durable vessel for information. The codex was an improvement over the scroll in terms of durability and ease of use. You could pack more feet of writing into a smaller space using a codex. It was easier to mark your place. And the flat codex was easier to wrap in a protective envelope and carry away with you. This technology developed in a time of economic instability, widespread migration, and increased interest in the written word. It didn’t suddenly arise fully formed in the shape we recognize today. People experimented a bit first. 

    From these late antique precedents, medieval books further refined the technology of the codex. In my opinion, the book-as-container really peaked in the Middle Ages because these are the most durable books around. Animal skin inscribed with acidic ink is still readable even if it falls in a lake. They’re much more fire resistant than a paper book, because it takes ages for dense, leather bound, parchment books to actually catch on fire. Why don’t we make them this way anymore? Well, for one thing, it’s expensive, and although “information has value,” words are cheap [1].

    I’m fascinated, in contrast, by the ephemerality of digital media. How do we get patrons to remember that our e-resources exist? Out of sight, out of mind. Despite their invisibility, files still take up space. The information is physically inscribed somewhere (on an AWS server, probably). On the internet, the world of information appears nonexistent until you think to look for it. If you stop paying attention for a little while, it might really disappear–wiped from the servers that housed it as quickly as it was created. Better hope the Wayback Machine archived an image of the particular point in the lifecycle of the site that you’re interested in. Meanwhile, a book, especially an over-engineered medieval book, endures. 

    I didn’t know the term “artist book” before I came to work at Ringling College of Art + Design. My own book creations were made for the sake of understanding the book-as-technology. What happens if I use this thread instead of that thread? Can I recycle this type of leather into a cover? What does it feel like to sew through parchment? I think of myself more as a craftsperson than an artist, but this work prepared me to look critically at artist books. This is my favorite artist book from those I’ve cataloged so far: 

    https://ringling.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01RINGLING_INST/16oris8/alma993789250206101

    At first, I found the book challenging. I felt that it stretched the meaning of “book” almost to the breaking point. But then I opened one of the components and it reminded me of late-antique codices enclosed in leather envelopes. 

    I peered through the center of the closed component and understood the term “tunnel book.” I saw something that wasn’t language stored inside the book-as-container, something more like a feeling or a journey. The “artist book” light bulb came on. 

    Figuring out how the pieces of this artist book fit together and open up reminded me of puzzling out how an ancient binding works: How many layers are there? Can I see the joins and figure out how they’re attached? I return to the same kinds of questions that I ask myself when I repair a book from the general collection: How is this book put together? Can it stand up to being read a few more times? The artist book feels as delicate and precious as an archaeological artifact. 

    I often ask myself how the cataloging record can capture these experiments in book-as-technology, these containers of more than language. There are terms for different types of bindings and for different shapes of books. They are helpful if you already know what you’re looking for. I copy the artist's statement into the record in the hope that it will capture more of the feeling, but the record is not the original. Any digital representation is ephemeral, unsatisfactory, while the mass and structure of the book-as-container leaves a weighty impression. 

    There’s no closure to the process of thoughtful description. You can continue seeing, comparing to precedents, researching terms, imagining new formats for information, essentially forever. Manuscript description follows certain codified patterns, much like describing mass-manufactured modern books. Size, shape, materials, number of quires, paleographical analysis. Still, each pre-modern codex is a unique product of craftsmanship and artistic know-how, identifiable to an expert by those niggling little discrepancies of form and finish that set it apart from each other example of the same art. Artist books resist all standardized description which is what makes them fun to describe. They continuously innovate on the concept of book-as-container in ways that our cutting-edge digital technologies can never quite capture.

    [1] Association of College and Research Libraries, “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education,” American Library Association, January 11, 2016, https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework

     

    Dan’o Reid has an MA in History, an MA in Medieval Studies, and an MS in Information. They work at Ringling College of Art + Design, where they experience the singular joys of working with both aging materials and innovative technologies. In their spare time, they make blank journals and practice myriad textile arts. Contact them by email: dreid@ringling.edu or on LinkedIn.

  • 01 Aug 2026 12:00 AM | Susan Viguers (Administrator)

    If you're a librarian or have ever heard the term "weeding," it can pull at your heartstrings, and depending on your personality type – either in a good way or a bad one. If you're new here, weeding is the process of removing library materials that don't circulate, are in poor condition, or no longer serve the collection for a variety of reasons. But what happens when it’s too hard to let go, but something has got to give? Well, folks, we (Cheri Marks, Special Collections Librarian, and Kelly Lindberg, Research and Instruction Librarian) found ourselves in this exact position at Ringling College of Art + Design with some very cool (do we dare say dated?) materials that, instead of parting with, we’re looking at them through a new lens, and one that's full of potential. 

    Here’s the gist, y’all: We want to create an artist book from materials that are inevitably bound to be deaccessioned – not because they are damaged or unusable, but because their circulation numbers are nonexistent. We’re talking zero. Zip. Nada. We have fifty unbound lithograph prints that were donated to our library with unknown origins, and the portraits can easily be viewed online or purchased as their monetary value is low. So what's a small private art and design college going to do with these? 

    As librarians that specifically work in Sarasota, Florida, we wanted this idea to be impactful. Our regional area has unfortunately been a hotspot for anti-LGBTQ+ ideas and acts. Rainbow crosswalks and sidewalks filled with public art were enthusiastically erased in the area. Kelly previously worked at the Jane Bancroft Cook Library at New College of Florida, where, during her time there, administration very dramatically tore down “all-gender” bathroom signs. (Luckily, the DeSantis appointed board of trustee members never noticed the books on Critical Race Theory displayed on the new book shelves.) The local public library system has seemed to pause any pride month celebrations or displays that previously existed before current political officers took office. As a private institution, we’re lucky to have had a bit of a bubble around our campus in which we can still promote diversity, equity, and inclusion – however, our Center for Diversity and Inclusion was in fact renamed to be the Center for Student Success so as to not displease potential donors. These local events prompted us to think more intentionally about visibility, representation, and whose stories are welcomed in public spaces. We wanted to create something for patrons to be excited about and have fun with – a book of old, unused prints of some known and some unknown white men into something “glamorous, hilarious, and rebellious” (Hall, Intro.). Drag is often seen as radical and disruptive, something we felt putting out into our community where so much has been taken away. We also wanted to lighten the mood, as “not only does drag set out to subvert society’s norms, it delights at poking fun at the world around us” (Hall, Intro.).


    An inspiring book, The Art of Drag by Jake Hall. 

    Approaching the project

    Now for the fun part. Those fifty prints are about to take on a whole new life. We’re looking for a large collaboration within our institution, inviting fifty folks to each transform one portrait print into drag. We hope to see a wide range of techniques and mediums, from some stitching, folding, cutting, layering, and all the other cool stuff us creatives like to work with. Once all fifty prints have had their makeover, they’ll come back together to be bound into an accordion artist book. As we work through mockups, we’ll be thinking about giving these prints a second chance to be seen and interacted with, in an entirely new way. Rather than viewing deaccessioned materials as waste, we began wondering whether they could continue serving the library in another form – not as circulating objects, but as catalysts for artistic collaboration and dialogue. Once this project is complete, it will permanently live in Special Collections and be ready to be discovered by our patrons.

    In conclusion

    The prints have become institutionally invisible through nonuse. Drag historically makes marginalized identities visible. Drag is an art form, a performance practice, and a cultural tradition. Drag is one of the richest artistic traditions centered on transformation, performance, reinvention, and making the unseen visible. We wanted to reclaim the old and make something new, and this artist book makes both visible again.

    As we continue to move through the mockup phases and figure out the details of this project, we’re hoping that this blog sparks some interest and opens up a dialogue around what it means to reimagine materials that might otherwise be overlooked. We’d love to hear from other folks in the community – librarians, archivists, bookmakers, artists, and anyone else who has found themselves asking, “What do we do with the things that no longer fit?”

    Because let’s be honest, letting go of materials can be complicated, whether that’s small scraps of paper trimmings from a recent artist book project (yes, I’m looking at you, at me, at all of us!), to archivists sifting through their collections. There’s history, there’s emotion, and sometimes there’s just too much creative potential sitting there waiting to be explored. We’re excited to share this project, hear different perspectives, and see how others approach creating something new from something old.


    Some examples that have already been created by Ringling folks.

     

    Work Cited

    Jake Hall, The Art of Drag, artwork by Sofie Birkin, Helen Li, Jasjyot Singh Hans & more (Nobrow Press, 2020).


    Cheri Marks serves as the Special Collections Librarian & Archivist, and letterpress instructor at Ringling College of Art + Design. She makes artist books and prints under the imprint, Blue Section Press. You can find her work @bluesection.press (Instagram) and Ringling College of Art + Design Special Collections @rcad_specialcollections (Instagram). 

    Kelly Lindberg is an Instructional Design Librarian at Ringling College of Art + Design’s Alfred R. Goldstein Library, with a longstanding interest in zines and comics. She actively incorporates these passions into her teaching of information literacy to students. You can find her at @comic.kelly (Instagram) and view her posts on @alfredrgoldsteinlibrary (Instagram).


  • 14 Jul 2026 6:13 PM | Susan Viguers (Administrator)

    In 2018, I started looking at colleges. One of the colleges I focused on was the College of Saint Benedict/Saint John’s University (CSB+SJU) in St. Joseph, Minnesota. CSB+SJU was never high on my list, as it is my mother’s alma mater and was the college my sister attended. As an independent person, I did not want to attend a school where my name would be linked to my sister’s, and we would be compared. However, during my tour, my admissions officer offhandedly mentioned the Welle Book Arts Studio. This was the first time book arts had been brought to my attention. After that meeting, I researched the studio and the classes offered. I added a book arts program to the pro list for college and marked the absence of a book arts program as a con on all other schools. Ultimately, it was the book arts and German minors offered at CSB+SJU that made my decision.

    I was one of two graduates with a minor in book arts in 2025. Through the program, I learned printmaking, letterpress, graphic design, completed an exhibit as part of my internship requirement, and sat in a few papermaking classes that went until 11:00 pm. After the papermaking classes, I was soaked, cold, and had to trudge through the winter snow back to my apartment, but I had never been happier. I would spend late nights in the letterpress studio, goofing off with the type and printing random posters.


    One of my first posters of my favorite German phrase, “You have a Slappable Face.”  Photo by Kathryn Schug

    I took my first book arts class during the spring semester of my sophomore year. The class, Introduction to Letterpress & Design, was incredible. We were thrown into letterpress right away, given free rein of the studio and type cases. Playing with letter placement on the Vandercook pressbed was exciting. Letterpress was the first art form I felt I was good at and could claim I was “artistic.”

    Sophomore year was also when I took my first college-level creative writing class and learned there was more to poetry than strict rhyming schemes and iambic pentameter. I learned about Acrostic, Ghazal, Villanelle, Free Verse, and many more types of poetry. My favorite poems to write are Free Verse, but especially poems that play with the page. Rearranging letters and words, I immediately saw the connection to letterpress. It was easier for me to take the words I wanted in my poem and rearrange them on a pressbed. I did not have to fight the automatic capitalization or layout restraints in Word; I could freely place my words where and how I wanted them.


    Spread from my artist book Hi Low. Photo by Kathryn Schug

    Artist books became my main focus in book arts. Every aspect of my artist books would deepen the meaning of my words, and I enjoyed having complete control over my creative project. For my final semester of college, an advanced section of the letterpress class was created for the two students receiving a book arts minor in 2025. We were given free rein over our projects and worked with our professor to create our curriculum. For my final project, I created my third artist book with three of my poems. It was a special project to me as it was the first time I wrote about living with Type 1 Diabetes. It was the hardest project I did at the time, both emotionally and in terms of scale, but it is the artist book I am proudest of.

    Halfway through the project, I was notified that two of my poems had been selected for publication by the Mid-Atlantic Review for their “Amplifying Disabled Voices” section. The book became so much more special to me. I love looking at my artist book, Hi Low, as it holds my first published poems. One of the poems, “32,” was printed in the Mid-Atlantic Review 2025 anthology just a few months ago.

    The link between creative writing and artist books is my favorite part of book arts, and both work together to keep me inspired.

     

    Kathryn Schug (she/her) is a writer and book artist based in Minneapolis, Minnesota. She works as a Historic Interpreter/Youth Specialist at the Edina Historical Society. As a recent book arts minor graduate, Schug is exploring affordable ways to practice book arts at home.

  • 01 Jul 2026 12:00 AM | Susan Viguers (Administrator)

    In 2024, I curated my first exhibition of artist books. The exhibition entitled Duality: Artists’ Books Exploring Multiple Sides featured 16 books from my college, The College of Saint Benedict’s artist book collection, and two copies of my first completed artist book. I chose the theme of duality after spending a lot of time looking through the collection, finding commonalities among my favorite books and in the theme present in my own book.

    The displayed artist books used their approach to the page, binding, and tactile materials to explore multiple perspectives of the artist’s chosen concepts. My hope was that the theme would inspire further exploration of artist books and the social contexts they encompass. One chosen book, Reading Dick and Jane with Me by Clarrisa Sligh, explored the idea that the Dick and Jane textbooks do not portray a universal childhood experience of the 1940s and 1950s, especially for Black children. Another book in the exhibition, My Heart’s Page, commissioned by the organization Organik, uses the traditional codex form to outline mass book-burning events from around the world. One example was Bebelplatz (colloquially known as Opernplatz) in Berlin, Germany, where 25,000 books were burned on May 10th, 1933. In memory of this tragedy, there is a copper plaque in Berlin with the quote from German poet Heinrich Heine: “Those who will burn books, will in the end burn people.” I saw this plaque on my 2023 trip to Germany. The quote inspired my first completed artist book and serves as the epigraph to one of my poems in that book. I stumbled upon My Heart’s Page when going through the collection and loved the connection it had to my artist book and the larger theme forming.


    Bebelplatz Plaque in Berlin. Photo by Kathryn Schug

    The poems in my dos-á-dos artist book, Blooming Books/Burning Blooming Books, highlight the importance of words. The poem, “Blooming Books," argues for the importance of words, while the other poem, “Burning Blooming Books,” explains the destructive and ill-advised activity of burning books.


    “Burning Blooming Books” side, featuring singed edges. Photo by Kathryn Schug

    Another displayed book, Wild Girls Redux: An Operator’s Manual by Ellen Knudson, overlays images of pin-up girls on the Missouri Department of Revenue Motorcycle Operator Manual, whose words Knudson satirically adapts to be about “operating” women. Philip Gallo controls both sides of the narrative in Electric Tulips 5.1. Writing under the pseudonym Alessandro S. Strega, a revered literary critic, Gallo authors the essay “Future Preterite” about his poem “Electric Tulips 5.1.” This artist book alludes to a similar move made by James Joyce in the Sylvia Beach Publication of 1929, where he praised his novel Ulysses under the pseudonym Vladimir Dixon.

    One of the artist books I felt was most important to display was Glass House by Ann Lovett. In her book, Lovett writes a poem about Ann Lovett, a 15-year-old from Ireland with the same name, whose life was very different from her own. In 1984, Ann (the child) died after giving birth to a stillborn in a Grotto of the Virgin Mary. As the artist Lovett wrote, the poem explores “sensuality and the failures of Catholicism in her [Ann’s] life.” It was important to me to highlight the effect abortion bans have on young people, especially at a college rooted in Benedictine Values with its own Virgin Mary Grotto, which has a pro-life club but fails to support a pro-choice club.


    The final page in Glass House, featured in the exhibit. Photo by Kathryn Schug 



    The Virgin Mary Grotto at the College of Saint Benedict. Photo by Kathryn Schug

    Duality is present throughout life. Only viewing one side of a debate is how echo chambers begin and thrive, ultimately hindering the dissemination of knowledge and open conversations. My goal in displaying artist books whose themes fit duality was to invite conversations around larger social issues.


    Kathryn Schug (she/her) is a writer and book artist based in Minneapolis, Minnesota. She works as a Historic Interpreter/Youth Specialist at the Edina Historical Society. As a recent book arts minor graduate, Schug is exploring affordable ways to practice book arts at home.

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   Next >  Last >> 
Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software